★

A U.S.-based strategic initiative

Institutional practitioners in a working session

Institutional cooperation

Partnership with defined responsibilities.

ASPC approaches partnership as an accountable institutional relationship, not a promotional designation.

Who may engage

Public and civic institutions

Institutions with legitimate responsibility for administration, development, research, or public service.

Academic and research bodies

Organizations contributing relevant evidence, methodology, expertise, or evaluation.

Responsible enterprise

Businesses and associations able to contribute capability while disclosing commercial interests.

Technical practitioners

Individuals and professional bodies with applied knowledge relevant to a defined institutional need.

Partnership review process

01

Initial inquiry

Identify the institution, proposed purpose, relevant authority, intended participants, and expected value.

02

Compatibility review

Evaluate relevance, capability, conflicts, representation risk, resources, and applicable safeguards.

03

Defined terms

Document status, responsibilities, permitted public language, outputs, review, and conclusion.

Representation standards

No governmental implication

No ASPC relationship may be represented as endorsement, accreditation, diplomatic status, federal access, or United States Government partnership.

  • Use approved ASPC naming and status language.
  • Disclose material financial and organizational interests.
  • Obtain approval before using the ASPC seal or identity.
  • Distinguish discussion, proposed cooperation, and adopted partnership.
  • Conclude or correct public representation when status changes.

Institutional inquiries

Organizations considering an inquiry should review ASPC’s mission, priorities, and publication standards before making contact.

Contact the Council →